In doing some research, I've become more convinced that one can't understand the Obama plan of action unless one understands Saul Alinsky. (Hillary wrote her college thesis on him) I've been aware of the link for some time, and remember Alinsky from the 60's --- but was fuzzy on some of the details. Take a look at the following:
http://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/communism/alinsky.htm
With hope for a Republican win dwindling away, concern is now surfacing in the Country Club Republican ranks about "too much bitterness against Obama" --- with the implication (even sometimes expressly stated) that "Obama won't be so bad ... we'll come out OK here ... Let's just all get along." I disagree --- the Alinsky connection is extremely important to understand, and the implications are obvious and chilling. Some of the things that will happen under Obama/Reid/Pelosi:
And ....much more.
Point here is --- the Alinsky method (totalitarian, atheist, elitist) expressly suggests lying to the masses anytime it's beneficial (like before this election). They are perfectly clear about this. Additionally, the outcome (which Jonah Goldberg calls a liberal, fascist State Religion) justifies any means necessary. These people are devoted, and ruthless. All of Obamas actions, when viewed from an Alinsky framework, are 100% coherent. Lies, "Present" votes, flip flops, more lies, voting fraud, race card plays, etc.
So -- I'm not in the "Let's All Get Along" crowd. When this piece of Marxist crap is elected, I'm for raising hell and resisting every inch of the way -- and yes, doing everything possible to discredit, damage, and destroy them. For the life of me I don't understand why Bush (and McCain too) continue to think that there is such a thing as "Bipartisan action". It's not just purely partisan -- it's a death struggle for the survival of classically-liberal Democracy. I wish it weren't this way, but it is. The cultural battle has been won, at least for now, because the liberal fascists have been in the game to win, while conservatives were in the game to enjoy the nice weather and have a few beers afterwards.
One more thing: I was at the Pentagon on the night of May 19, 1972 when the WU bombed the place. If they had any competent chemists on staff (think Tim McVeigh), they would have got my butt. So I'm sensitive about this. In the entire Obama-Ayers presentation, even by McCain, it's all about "Obama's bad choice of allies". They are missing the more damning point: Why did Bill Ayers select Obama to run his Annenberg-funded Organization Scam? It was NOT because Obama lived close and they could chat over drinks -- it was because Obama was totally committed to the Alinsky Marxist goals that Ayers envisioned -- and the results bear this out. ( The fact that there were a few non-committed folks (who didn't have the votes to change policy) in the mix is, again, straight out of the Alinsky playbook -- to afford tacit plausible deniability to the stacked deck.)
How did we let this thing go so bad so fast?

0 comments:
Post a Comment